President Donald Trump issued a forceful warning to Iran, declaring that any attempt by leaders in Tehran to carry out an assassination against him would result in devastating retaliation. Speaking in blunt terms, Trump said that continued threats from Iranian officials would be met with the country getting “blown up” and facing “total obliteration.” The remarks underscore escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran at a time when diplomatic negotiations are ongoing but fragile. Trump framed his warning as both a deterrent and a clear red line, signaling that the United States would respond with overwhelming force if harm were to come to him. The comments revive long-standing animosity rooted in events from his first term in office and highlight the precarious balance between diplomacy and military pressure that has defined U.S.–Iran relations in recent years.
Trump elaborated on his position by stating that he had already left explicit instructions for a severe response in the event of an attack. “Well, they shouldn’t be doing it but I’ve left notification,” he said. “Anything ever happens, we’re going to blow the whole — the whole country’s going to get blown up.” He emphasized that he had provided “very firm instructions,” adding that if anything were to happen, the United States would “wipe them off the face of this earth.” According to Trump, he had been briefed by intelligence officials about alleged Iranian threats during the 2024 presidential campaign. Those briefings reportedly detailed concerns about potential plots linked to Tehran. Former Attorney General Merrick Garland previously described such threats as retaliation for the U.S. strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020. That strike, ordered by Trump during his first administration, dramatically escalated tensions between the two nations and remains a flashpoint in their fraught relationship.
Despite acknowledging that intelligence officials from the previous administration had informed him of the threats, Trump criticized President Joe Biden for not speaking publicly about the matter. He argued that presidents should defend one another against foreign threats, regardless of political differences. “Biden should have said something,” Trump asserted, suggesting that bipartisan unity is essential when confronting adversaries like Iran. The comments reveal not only Trump’s hardline stance toward Tehran but also his continued criticism of Biden’s handling of foreign policy. Trump portrayed himself as decisive and uncompromising, contrasting what he views as his strong posture with what he considers a lack of sufficient public condemnation from his successor. By framing the issue as one of national unity and deterrence, Trump sought to reinforce the seriousness of the alleged threats while simultaneously drawing a political distinction between his leadership style and Biden’s.
At the same time, Trump discussed ongoing diplomatic efforts between the United States and Iran, particularly talks taking place in Geneva. Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump indicated that he would be indirectly involved in the negotiations and described them as highly significant. When asked what he expected from the talks, he acknowledged that Iran has a reputation as a tough negotiator. “They’re good negotiators — or bad negotiators,” he said, adding that he believed Tehran had previously miscalculated U.S. resolve. Trump referenced the use of B-2 bombers to target Iranian nuclear facilities, arguing that military action became necessary because Iran overplayed its hand. Nonetheless, he expressed cautious optimism that Iran ultimately wants to make a deal. When pressed on whether a diplomatic breakthrough was unlikely, Trump rejected the notion, stating, “No. I think they want to make a deal. I don’t think they want the consequences of not making a deal.” His comments suggest that while he is prepared to escalate militarily, he still views diplomacy as a viable path—provided it produces terms acceptable to Washington.
Trump also reiterated that he had taken concrete steps to maximize leverage over Tehran. Shortly after returning to office, he signed an executive order designed to give him expanded tools to pressure Iran’s government. He said that he had instructed officials to ensure that if Iran were ever to kill him, the response would be swift and absolute. “If they did that, they would be obliterated. That would be the end,” Trump said previously. Beyond personal threats, Trump warned that the United States could increase its military presence in the region if negotiations falter. In remarks to Axios, he said the administration is considering deploying an additional aircraft carrier strike group alongside the USS Abraham Lincoln and nine other warships already positioned near Iran. He characterized the current deployment as an “armada,” adding that another carrier group might soon join it. “Either we will make a deal or we will have to do something very tough like last time,” he said, referencing previous strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. The message was clear: diplomacy remains the preferred option, but the United States is prepared to use force if necessary.
The broader context of Trump’s remarks includes both regional dynamics and high-level diplomacy. He has emphasized that any agreement with Iran must go beyond nuclear restrictions to include limits on ballistic missile development and support for militant proxy groups across the Middle East. Iranian officials have so far resisted expanding negotiations beyond nuclear-related issues, creating a sticking point in talks. Trump has maintained that the nuclear question is a “matter of course” in any negotiation but insisted that missile stockpiles and regional activities must also be addressed. His comments came ahead of a planned visit to Washington by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is expected to advocate for a tougher U.S. stance. Netanyahu has indicated he will present principles he believes are essential for peace and security in the region, reflecting Israel’s longstanding concerns about Iran’s military capabilities. Meanwhile, the U.S. administration has bolstered its military posture in the Middle East, deploying additional ships and aircraft as both deterrence and leverage. Together, these developments illustrate a high-stakes moment in U.S.–Iran relations, where rhetoric, military positioning, and diplomacy intersect, and where the outcome could shape regional stability for years to come.
WATCH:
