President Donald Trump’s education secretary, Linda McMahon, has launched a sharp and highly publicized attack on Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, calling for his resignation over what she described as a widening and deeply troubling fraud scandal. In a strongly worded letter obtained by Fox News Digital, McMahon accused Walz of systemic failures in oversight during his time as governor, arguing that those failures allowed large-scale fraud to flourish across multiple state-run programs. The letter represents a significant escalation in tensions between the Trump administration and Minnesota’s Democratic leadership, framing the issue not as isolated misconduct but as a broader breakdown of accountability. McMahon’s criticism places education policy at the center of a wider debate over government competence, fiscal responsibility, and the stewardship of taxpayer dollars. By publicly urging Walz to step down, the administration signaled that it views the allegations not merely as administrative shortcomings, but as a fundamental breach of trust that, in its view, disqualifies him from continued leadership.
In the letter, McMahon directly linked Walz’s tenure since 2019 to what she characterized as an influx of organized fraud, using language that echoed President Trump’s own remarks. She accused the governor of a “careless lack of oversight” and alleged that Minnesota’s welfare and assistance systems had become magnets for fraudsters seeking to exploit weak controls. According to McMahon, these vulnerabilities enabled large sums of public money to be siphoned off with little resistance, damaging public confidence in government institutions. She cited President Trump’s assertion that Minnesota had effectively become a “fraudulent hub of money laundering activity,” a claim that intensified the political tone of the letter. McMahon concluded this portion of her message by stating that Walz’s alleged dereliction of duty warranted resignation, arguing that Minnesotans deserved leadership capable of safeguarding public resources and restoring credibility to state programs that serve vulnerable populations.
Central to McMahon’s criticism is Minnesota’s high-profile nonprofit fraud scandal, which has drawn national attention in recent years. The case involving Feeding Our Future and related organizations alleged that at least $1 billion in taxpayer funds were misappropriated during Walz’s administration. Federal prosecutors have described a complex web of fraudulent claims, fake meal counts, and shell entities that exploited emergency food programs. McMahon argued that the scale of the fraud reflected systemic weaknesses rather than isolated wrongdoing, and she placed responsibility squarely on the governor’s office. Beyond food assistance programs, the education secretary extended her critique to Minnesota’s higher education system, which she said had also been affected by widespread abuse. By tying together nonprofit fraud and alleged failures in educational oversight, McMahon portrayed a pattern of governance lapses that, in her view, allowed criminals to operate unchecked across multiple sectors.
The Department of Education’s recent enforcement actions featured prominently in McMahon’s letter. She noted that during President Trump’s first year back in office, the department blocked more than $1 billion in fraudulent student aid nationwide through expanded safeguards and stricter verification processes. Minnesota, however, was highlighted as one of the states most affected by alleged student aid fraud. According to Fox News Digital, Riverland Community College alone averaged more than 100 potentially fraudulent student aid applications per year. McMahon stated that her department identified nearly 2,000 so-called “ghost students” connected to Minnesota colleges and universities. These individuals, she said, were not properly identity-verified, often did not reside in the United States, or in some cases did not exist at all. Collectively, these ghost students allegedly received $12.5 million in grants and loans without attending classes, sharing a portion with institutions and keeping the rest.
McMahon also used the letter to criticize Representative Ilhan Omar, a Minnesota Democrat, tying her comments to broader concerns about accountability and repayment of federal loans. She alleged that Omar borrowed tens of thousands of dollars in student loans and later opposed repayment obligations despite earning a substantial taxpayer-funded salary. Referencing reports from conservative watchdog groups, McMahon pointed to calls for garnishment of Omar’s congressional wages to recover outstanding student loan debt. In McMahon’s framing, Omar’s case symbolized what she described as a culture of entitlement and misuse of public funds. The letter further expanded its scope beyond education, accusing the Walz administration of presiding over widespread welfare fraud across housing assistance, food programs, small-business relief, and services for seniors and children with autism. McMahon argued that these failures enriched perpetrators while leaving taxpayers and legitimate beneficiaries at a disadvantage.
Walz has rejected the characterization that he ignored fraud, though he has acknowledged shortcomings in communication and oversight. Last week, he announced the launch of a new statewide fraud prevention initiative and the hiring of a private forensic auditing firm to strengthen controls and identify vulnerabilities. “I take full responsibility for it,” Walz said, adding that the state had not done enough to communicate the steps being taken to address the problem. His response suggests an effort to demonstrate accountability while disputing claims of inaction. Nonetheless, McMahon’s letter underscores a broader political battle over responsibility, reform, and the limits of executive oversight. As investigations continue and reforms are implemented, the dispute highlights the national implications of state-level fraud scandals and the intense scrutiny facing governors as federal authorities demand stronger safeguards for taxpayer-funded programs.