Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has issued a stark warning regarding what he describes as the increasingly “very dangerous” rhetoric and behavior coming from Democrats, suggesting that it could escalate into serious threats against former President Donald Trump. Gingrich’s comments come amid reports of at least two failed attempts on Trump’s life, heightening concerns about political violence and the intensity of partisan conflict in the United States. During an interview on Fox News, Gingrich emphasized that the situation goes beyond normal political disagreement, portraying it as a reflection of a broader societal challenge in which violent impulses and extreme actions threaten democratic norms and the safety of political leaders.
Gingrich directly addressed claims from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., who had asserted that Republicans are “on the run.” The former Speaker dismissed Jeffries’ characterization, arguing instead that Democrats are driven by rage and lack concrete solutions to address national challenges. He contended that the Democratic Party’s current posture represents an escalation in tactics designed to resist Trump’s political influence and oppose initiatives aimed at reducing government spending, such as those championed by Elon Musk. Gingrich framed this opposition as less about policy and more about disrupting a system of governance that Trump and his allies are seeking to reform.
In his remarks, Gingrich drew historical parallels, invoking President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address to underscore the gravity of the current political climate. He described a segment of the population that believes it is entitled to act violently, override democratic processes, and flout the law. According to Gingrich, such behavior must be met with firm enforcement of the law, stating bluntly, “you have to lock them up. You have to enforce the law. Period.” He argued that when society collectively enforces legal boundaries, it serves as a necessary safeguard against escalating threats, emphasizing that figures like Elon Musk, who serve in advisory roles to the president, should be protected rather than targeted by hostile political actors.
Gingrich also criticized what he perceived as a lack of empathy and moral engagement among House Democrats, describing their reactions during recent congressional events as detached and indifferent. He highlighted instances where members failed to acknowledge the achievements and struggles of ordinary Americans, from a 13-year-old cancer survivor to a young man aspiring to attend West Point. Gingrich suggested that this behavior reflects a broader pattern of disconnection and frustration within the Democratic leadership, arguing that their current rage stems from Trump’s efforts to challenge entrenched systems that many Americans view as corrupt and ineffective.
He reinforced this point by citing data from the America’s New Majority project, noting that 82% of Americans believe the current system is corrupt. Gingrich interpreted this as a sign of widespread dissatisfaction that could have significant consequences for the survival of democratic freedom. He suggested that the Democratic Party’s focus on defending bureaucracy and existing structures of power has placed it at odds with public sentiment, leaving the party with a steep challenge as it heads toward the 2026 midterm elections. For Gingrich, this disconnect between party leadership and popular opinion underscores both a strategic and moral vulnerability within the Democratic Party.
Finally, Gingrich drew a broader contrast between what he described as the destructiveness of the Democratic leadership and the “remarkable focus on peace” demonstrated by Trump and his team. He argued that Democratic figures, particularly in New York, are increasingly disconnected from the realities faced by ordinary Americans, citing comments by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer as examples of this disconnect. According to Gingrich, while the Democratic leadership promotes policies he views as radical and out of touch, Trump has consistently prioritized national stability and effective governance. He concluded that this contrast will become a critical talking point leading into November’s midterm elections, highlighting the differences in priorities, demeanor, and approach to leadership between the two parties.
WATCH:
