The White House blasted a top Democratic leader for defending Delegate Stacey Plaskett after her past messages with Jeffrey Epstein resurfaced, accusing Democrats of downplaying misconduct while demanding transparency from others. Officials said protecting political allies undermines credibility in the broader Epstein records investigation.

The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee drew criticism from President Donald Trump and the White House on Tuesday after dismissing a colleague’s text messages with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein as simply “taking a phone call from her constituent.” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) made the remark during debate over a resolution to censure Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-U.S. Virgin Islands) for coordinating with Epstein ahead of a Feb. 27, 2019, House Oversight Committee hearing featuring testimony from Michael Cohen.

“They’ve arraigned a Democratic member for taking a phone call from her constituent, Jeffrey Epstein, in the middle of a hearing,” Raskin said during floor debate. “And of course, I don’t think there’s any rule here against taking phone calls in a hearing.” He went on to question the basis for the censure effort, asking Republicans where the ethical or legal transgression was and warning them to “be careful” in setting such a precedent.

The White House blasted Raskin’s comments, calling him “one of the worst to ever disgrace the halls of Congress” and describing Plaskett’s interaction with Epstein as collusion with a convicted sex offender. Deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson questioned why Raskin was minimizing the interaction, invoking reports about other Democrats’ past connections to Epstein.

Commentators on social media also condemned Raskin’s defense of Plaskett, with users highlighting alleged hypocrisy and resurfacing his own remarks tying Donald Trump to Epstein. Independent journalist Lee Fang, who has reported on Plaskett’s ties to Epstein, said Raskin’s description was “incredibly dishonest,” pointing to Plaskett’s past work with Epstein-linked interests and political support from his network.

The motion to censure Plaskett and remove her from the House Intelligence Committee failed in a 214–209 vote. Earlier Tuesday, the House voted 427–1 to require the Justice Department to release all files related to Epstein, who was arrested on federal sex-trafficking charges in 2019 and found dead in jail later that year. Copies of Plaskett’s communication with Epstein were among 20,000 documents from his estate released Nov. 12 by the House Oversight Committee.

In their text exchanges, Epstein advised Plaskett on how to frame her questioning of Michael Cohen, including prompts about other figures at the Trump Organization. “Yup. Very aware and waiting my turn,” she responded, according to the New York Post.

Related Posts

Emails cited in newly released records show Jeffrey Epstein was invited to a Democratic fundraiser to “get to know” Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, according to event organizers. The messages don’t indicate Jeffries engaged with Epstein, but the disclosure sparked renewed scrutiny of political ties.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer accused House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ campaign of “soliciting money from Jeffrey Epstein,” citing a 2013 email inviting Epstein to a…

Former President Donald Trump praised Republicans after the Senate approved a bill sending Epstein files to his desk, calling it a major GOP victory. He said the measure advances transparency while criticizing Democrats for acting only after political pressure intensified.

President Donald Trump on Tuesday celebrated congressional passage of a bipartisan bill forcing the release of the long-sealed Jeffrey Epstein files, reaffirming he intends to sign the…

Speaker Mike Johnson accused Democrats of politicizing renewed interest in Epstein files, noting they held them for years under Biden. He warned their proposal lacks victim safeguards, risks exposing innocents and sensitive sources, and threatens national security, while Republicans pursue careful transparency.

Tuesday, at the weekly House Republican Leadership press conference, Speaker Mike Johnson discussed House Republicans’ efforts to deliver maximum transparency regarding the Epstein files and ensure justice…

“Supreme Court Delivers Landmark Ruling That Could Reshape Federal Law, Redefine Constitutional Boundaries, and Establish a Historic Precedent Impacting Civil Rights, Government Authority, and the Balance of Power Between States and the Federal Judiciary, Transforming the Legal Landscape Nationwide.”

The Supreme Court has recently authorized the Trump administration to deport a group of eight immigrants currently detained at a U.S. military base in Djibouti to South…

We Announce With Heavy Hearts the Passing of a Beloved Figure Whose Courage, Spirit, and Influence Touched Thousands, Leaving Behind an Unforgettable Legacy of Strength, Advocacy, and Love That Continues to Inspire Even as Family, Friends, and Admirers Struggle With the Immense Weight of Loss and Memory

“I brought my daughter into the world and took her out of it.” As I held Deborah’s hand during her final moments, a mix of sadness and…

Here’s a **40-word** neutral summary based on that headline: A Democratic Senate candidate is calling for significant reforms to the Supreme Court, proposing structural and procedural changes aimed at reducing partisanship and increasing accountability. The candidate argues that current judicial dynamics threaten democratic norms and require bold corrective action.

Graham Platner, a former Marine, military contractor, small businessman, and oyster farmer running as a Democrat to unseat Maine Sen. Susan Collins (R), is calling for sweeping…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *