Speaker Johnson expressed anger over what he described as a hidden provision in the government-funding bill used to reopen federal operations. He argued the measure was inserted without proper disclosure and said it undermined transparency as Congress worked to resolve the shutdown.

A little-noticed provision in the Senate’s latest government funding bill has renewed Republican scrutiny of surveillance practices used during the Biden administration in Jan. 6–related investigations. What began as a routine vote to avert a government shutdown escalated into a cross-chamber dispute after House Republicans learned that senators had added language offering legal protections available only to members of the upper chamber.

The provision would allow senators who were targets of former special counsel Jack Smith’s “Arctic Frost” investigation to sue the federal government if they were surveilled without prior notice. It covers eight GOP senators—Lindsey Graham, Bill Hagerty, Josh Hawley, Dan Sullivan, Tommy Tuberville, Ron Johnson, Cynthia Lummis and Marsha Blackburn—each potentially eligible for $500,000 if they pursue a claim. House Republicans said they were caught off guard by the change.

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) called the House back from a 54-day recess to address the unexpected addition, calling it a last-minute move that most members had not been informed about. Lawmakers argued the provision granted legal protections to senators while offering no comparable remedy for House members, creating what they described as an uneven and unacceptable disparity. “We had no idea that was dropped in at the last minute,” Johnson said.

The frustration spread quickly on social media. Rep. John Rose (R-TN) accused Republican senators of secretly inserting a clause that would give themselves up to $500,000 “of your money,” while offering nothing to Jan. 6 defendants. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) labeled the arrangement “shady” and “fubar,” saying senators had guaranteed themselves payouts tied to DOJ settlement possibilities. Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) voted against the bill, denouncing it as “self-dealing” and predicting the Senate would reject any rollback attempt.

Despite tensions, House Republicans advanced the legislation to avoid a prolonged shutdown. The measure funds several federal agencies, including Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, through January. A Democratic effort to extend expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies was not included, though Senate leaders said the matter would be revisited next month. New reporting also indicates that Jan. 6-related surveillance extended beyond senators, reaching former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and former Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas).

The dispute underscores growing GOP friction as House members object to what they view as preferential treatment for senators. With new legal protections now in place for the upper chamber, House Republicans must contend with internal dissent and broader political ramifications tied to ongoing Jan. 6 investigations. The episode raises larger questions about accountability and perceptions of self-interest during a critical moment in the legislative process.