Winter Olympic champion Eileen Gu has publicly responded to criticism from U.S. Vice President JD Vance regarding her decision to represent China in international competition. The 22-year-old freestyle skiing star, who was born in San Francisco and raised in the United States, addressed the remarks while competing at the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano. Gu has been in standout form at the Games, qualifying in the halfpipe before advancing to the finals on 21 February and ultimately securing a gold medal. Yet even as she celebrated athletic success, questions about national allegiance and identity resurfaced, highlighting how elite sport can intersect with political debate.
The controversy began when Vance was asked during a Fox News interview on 17 February about Gu’s decision to compete for China rather than the United States. He responded that while he had “no idea” what her official status should be, he believed that someone who grew up in America and benefited from its education system and freedoms would ideally want to represent the United States. “I’m going to root for American athletes,” Vance said, adding that he supports competitors who identify themselves as Americans. His comments reflected a broader view that athletic representation should align with national upbringing and identity, a stance that has resonated with some Americans but drawn criticism from others who view such decisions as deeply personal and multifaceted.
Reporters at the Milano Games later raised Vance’s remarks with Gu, asking whether she felt like “a bit of a punching bag for a certain strand of American politics.” Gu acknowledged that she does sometimes feel targeted. She noted that many athletes around the world choose to compete for countries different from where they were born or raised, often because of family heritage, dual citizenship, or strategic considerations in highly competitive sports systems. In her view, the intensity of the reaction to her choice stems less from the general practice of switching national representation and more from geopolitical tensions involving China. She suggested that critics often treat China as a “monolithic entity” and that their objections are colored by broader political attitudes rather than solely by sportsmanship concerns.
Gu further argued that her success may amplify the scrutiny she faces. “If I wasn’t doing well, I think that they probably wouldn’t care as much,” she said, indicating that winning medals on the Olympic stage has heightened visibility around her decision. Still, she emphasized that she respects the right of individuals to hold differing opinions. In a separate conversation with USA TODAY, Gu offered a lighthearted response to the vice president’s remarks, saying, “I’m flattered. Thanks, JD! That’s sweet.” The comment underscored her attempt to defuse tension with humor, even as the debate touches on sensitive themes of nationality, loyalty, and identity. Her approach has been consistent with her public persona: composed, media-savvy, and focused primarily on performance.
The episode unfolded against the backdrop of broader political discourse involving other American athletes. Gu recently expressed sympathy for U.S. freeskier Hunter Hess, who said he felt uncomfortable representing the United States amid dissatisfaction with the current administration. In response to Hess’s comments, President Donald Trump criticized him on social media, calling him a “real loser.” Gu said she felt sorry for athletes caught in political crossfire, noting that competitors often become symbolic figures in national debates they did not seek to enter. Her remarks suggested a desire to separate athletic performance from partisan politics, even as high-profile sporting events like the Olympics inevitably carry national significance.
Gu’s personal background adds complexity to the discussion. Born in San Francisco to Yan Gu, a first-generation Chinese immigrant, and an American father, she grew up navigating two cultures. She later attended Stanford University while building a global athletic and commercial career. In choosing to represent China, Gu has said in the past that she hopes to inspire young athletes and serve as a bridge between cultures. Her success at the Milano Games reinforces her status as one of freestyle skiing’s most prominent figures. Yet her story also illustrates how questions of identity in a globalized world can become politicized, particularly when elite sport intersects with international rivalry. As she continues to collect medals, Gu remains steadfast in her choice, framing it as an expression of personal heritage and opportunity rather than a repudiation of the country where she was born.
